You're working with your dev group on some technical enhancements, however you see a huge slice of the opportunity lies with content. Your company has a content group, however you notice they're not using keyword research to notify their articles.
Or how about this scenario?
You're a marketing director at a start-up. You understand that you require material, however don't have the competence or time to do it yourself, so you ask your network for recommendations and find yourself a freelance author. The only problem is, you're not always sure what to designate them. With little guideline to sweat off of, they produce material that misses the mark.
The service in both of these scenarios is a content brief Not all content briefs are produced equal.
As someone who copes with one foot in material and the other in SEO, I can shed some light on how to make your content briefs both extensive and beloved by your content group.
Let's start by settling on some terms.
A content quick is a set of directions to direct an author on how to prepare a piece of material. That piece of material can be a post, a landing page, a white paper, or any variety of other efforts that require material.
Without a content short, you risk getting back content that does not fulfill your expectations. This will not just frustrate your author, but it'll also require more revisions, taking more of your money and time.
Typically, content briefs are composed by somebody in an adjacent field-- like need generation, product marketing, or SEO-- when they require something particular. Content groups normally don't just work off of briefs. They'll likely have their own calendar and efforts they're driving (content is among those odd functions that requires to support almost every other department while likewise developing and executing by themselves work).
An SEO-focused content short is one among lots of types of content briefs. It's special because the goal is to advise the author on creating content to target a particular search inquiry for the purpose of earning traffic from the organic search channel.
What to include in your material short.
Now that we comprehend SEO-focused content briefs in theory, let's enter the nitty gritty. What information should we include in them?
It isn't an SEO-focused content short without a question target!
Utilizing a keyword research study tool like Moz Keyword Explorer, you can get thousands of keyword ideas that could be appropriate to your organization.
For instance, in my present task, I'm concentrated on producing content for store owners and others in the brick and mortar retail industry. After listening to some sales and assistance calls on Gong (numerous teams use this to tape-record consumer and possibility calls), I may discover that "merchandising" is a huge topic of focus.
So I type "retailing" into Keyword Explorer, add a couple more practical filters, and boom! Lots of keyword ideas.
Select a keyword (examine your existing content to ensure your team hasn't currently composed on the subject yet) and utilize that as the "north star" inquiry for your content quick.
I believe it's also valuable to consist of some intent information here. In other words, what might the searcher who's typing this query into Google want? It's a great concept to browse the inquiry in Google yourself to see how Google is analyzing the intent.
If my keyword is "types of visual merchandising," I can see from the SERP that Google assumes an informative intent, based on the fact that the URLs ranking are mainly informative posts.
Dovetailing perfectly off of intent is format. Simply put, how should we structure the material to provide it the best possibility of ranking for our target question?
To use the exact same keyword example, if I Google "types of visual retailing," the top-ranking posts contain lists.
You may discover that your target inquiry returns results with a lot of images (common with inquiries including "inspiration" or "examples").
This better assists the author understand what material format is likely to work best.
Selecting the target query helps the writer comprehend the "big idea" of the piece, however stopping there indicates you risk composing something that doesn't adequately answer the question intent.
That's why I like to include a "topics to cover/ related concerns to respond to" section in my briefs. This is where I note out all the subtopics I have actually discovered that someone browsing that query would probably need to know.
To find these, I like to utilize approaches like:
Utilizing a keyword research tool to reveal you queries connected to your primary keyword that are concerns.
Looking at individuals Likewise Ask box, if one exists, on the SERP your target question triggers
Finding websites that rank in the top areas for your target query, running them through a keyword research study tool, and seeing what other keywords they likewise rank for
And while this isn't specifically search-related, sometimes I like to utilize a tool called Frequently Asked Question Fox to scour forums for threads that discuss my target query
You can likewise create the outline yourself using your research with all the H2s/H3s currently written. While this can work well with freelance authors, I have actually discovered some writers (especially in-house material online marketers) feel this is too prescriptive. Every author and content group is different, so all I can state is just use your finest judgment.
This is relatively comparable to intent, however I believe it's handy to consist of as a separate line product. To complete this part of the material quick, ask yourself: "Is somebody searching this term just trying to find information? Motivation? Looking to assess their choices? Or looking to buy something?"
And here's how you can identify your response:
Top-of-funnel (TOFU or "problem mindful") is an appropriate label if the query intent is informational/educational/inspirational.
Middle-of-funnel (MOFU or "option aware") is a proper label if the query intent is to compare, assess choices, or otherwise indicates that the searcher is already aware of your option.
Bottom-of-funnel (BOFU or "service prepared") is a suitable label if the question intent is to make a purchase or otherwise transform.
Who are you writing this for?
It appears like such a basic concern to address, but in my experience, it's simple to forget!
When it comes to SEO-focused material briefs, it's simple to assume the response to this question is "for whoever is browsing this keyword!" however what that stops working to answer is who those searchers are and how they fit into your company's personas/ perfect client profile (ICP).
If you do not know what those personalities are, ask your marketing group! They need to have target market sectors easily offered to send you.
This will not only help your authors much better understand what they need to be writing, however it also helps align you with the rest of the marketing department and assist them understand SEO's connection to their objectives (this is likewise a critical part of getting buy-in, which we'll talk about a little later).
SEO is a method to an end. It's not just adequate to get your content ranking and even to get it making clicks/traffic. For it to make an effect for your company, you'll want it to add to your bottom line.
That's why, when creating your material quick, you not just require to think of how readers will get to it, but what you desire them to do after.
This is an excellent opportunity to deal with your material marketing and larger marketing team to comprehend what actions they're trying to drive visitors to take.
Here are some examples of call-to-actions (CTAs) you can include in your briefs:
Newsletter sign-ups
Gated asset downloads (e.g. complimentary design templates, whitepapers, and ebooks).
Case studies.
Free trials.
Demand demonstration.
Product listings.
In basic, it's best to use a CTA that's a natural inbound marketing solutions next action based upon the intent of the post. If the piece is top-of-funnel, attempt a CTA that'll move them to the mid-funnel, like a case study.
I'm a company believer that the length of any article must be dictated by the topic, not approximate word counts. However, it can be handy to offer a ballpark to prevent bringing a 500-word post to a 2,000-word fight.
One tool that can make creating a ballpark word count much easier is Frase, which to name a few things, will reveal you the typical word count of pages ranking for your target question.
Given that you're reading the Moz blog site, you're most likely currently intimately familiar with the significance of links. This details is commonly left out of content briefs.
It's as basic as including these two line products:.
Appropriate content we ought to link out to. Note out any URLs, especially by yourself website, that could be natural fits to connect out to in this short article.
Existing material that could link to this brand-new piece. Note out any URLs on your website that discuss your subject so that, after your new piece is live, you can return and consist of links in them to your new piece.
The 2nd product is specifically crucial, because including links to your new post can help it get indexed and start ranking quicker. A fast way to find internal link opportunities is to utilize the "website:" operator in Google.
For instance, the following search would show me all posts on the Moz blog site that discuss "content short." These might be great sources of links to this article.
Browse your target inquiry and pull the leading three-or-so ranking URLs for this section of your content quick. These are the pages you require to beat.
At danger of developing copycat content (material that's basically a re-spun variation of the top-level short articles), it's an excellent idea to advise your author on how finest to utilize these.
I like to include concerns like:.
What's our special point-of-view on this subject?
Do we have any unique data we can pull on this subject?
What specialists (internal or external) can we ask for quotes to consist of on this subject?
What graphics would make this more aesthetically compelling than what our rivals have?
You get the idea!
Something I always like to include in my briefs is some form of an "SEO cheat sheet"-- suggestions and resources for helping your authors with important on-page SEO components.
Here's an example of one I've used in the past:.
Some content groups are really bullish on SEO (business like G2 and HubSpot come to mind), so the authors might not require much aid in this location. For others, SEO is fairly new to them.
What to avoid when writing content briefs.
Regretfully, "SEO" has ended up being a filthy word to many writers. Understanding why will help us prevent the significant pitfalls that can lead to neglected briefs and interdepartmental stress.
Do not provide tips after that asset has been written.
When composing for search, we're producing the output. The keyword is the input. To put it simply, target questions are concerns to be responded to, not something to be stuffed into copy that's already been composed.
Google wishes to rank content that answers the question, not just duplicates it on the page.
For this reason, I would prevent having an optimization action after your composing action. If you don't, you run the risk of the material not matching the intent of the query, which means it has little-to-no possibility of ranking, and you'll also likely distress your authors, who don't want to undervalue their editorially exceptional material by packing keywords into it.
Do not prefer keywords with high volume over high intent match.
I as soon as saw a quick where the SEO Supervisor asked for that the author utilize a particular expression rather of another phrase because it had search volume while the other didn't.
The problem? While apparently similar, the keywords actually had totally different intents.
Don't do this.
At best, targeting keywords simply for volume's sake can result in vanity traffic that never ever converts. At worst, you'll be trying to fit a square peg in a round hole and likely missing intent-match totally.
Don't blindly follow keyword tools.
Keyword tools are useful, but they're not best reflections of search need. For instance, due to the fact that they're not always updated incredibly typically, you may wrongly believe an inquiry has no need when in reality it has a lot.
A fine example of this is COVID-19 associated keywords. As a freshly trending topic earlier this year, numerous keyword research study tools didn't register that they had any search volume, when in truth they did. If you would have blindly followed the tool, you might have lost out on the opportunity.
To resolve for this, you can utilize tools like Google Trends or perhaps Google Browse Console (if you have content on a trending topic or comparable topic on your site currently, you need to have the ability to see impressions/interest spiking within a couple of days).
Do not instruct writers to "include these keywords" (specifically a particular number of times).
When noting out the target inquiry (or questions) in your content brief, it is very important that we advise our authors that this is the primary question to answer instead of this the word I need you to spray throughout the material.
There's no magic number of times you can stick a keyword in your copy so that it ranks for that term. Instead, advise your writers to concentrate on answering the intent of the searcher's concern adequately.
Do not try to jam keywords into articles that weren't intended for search discovery.
Organic search is not the only channel for material discovery. As somebody coming from an SEO background, this took me a while to learn.
That indicates including search material to your content calendar, not attempting to stuff keywords into whatever on the calendar.
While it's important to get the on-page SEO fundamentals right (title tag, heading tags, links, and so on) for every piece, not every piece lends itself well to organic search discovery.
For instance, if we just produced material based upon keywords that a tool informed us gets searched a certain number of times per month, we 'd never ever write about new ideas. It takes a lot of thought leadership off the table, along with things like case studies and interview/feature story pieces.
Organic search is powerful, however it's not everything.
Tips for getting your content team purchased in.
Even the best material briefs won't make an effect if your material group declines to utilize them-- and I've heard of plenty of circumstances where that occurs.
As an SEO, it can be mind-blowing that your material team doesn't want to utilize this: "Do not you want traffic?!" However as someone who leads a content team, I comprehend why they're often declined.
Fortunately, in many cases, this can be prevented by taking the following actions.
Include them in the planning procedure.
No one likes to be micromanaged, and extensive material briefs can sometimes feel like micromanaging. One excellent method to prevent this is by bringing them along for the procedure. Make material briefs a joint effort between SEO and Material.
Connect with the Material Lead and see if they 'd be prepared to sit down with you to produce the material quick template together. By each of you bringing your special expertise to the table, it can feel less like dictating and more like partnership (plus, you'll probably end up with a much better short template that way).
Make it clear that not all content has to be search material.
SEO Managers live and breathe the natural search channel, but content teams have a more varied diet plan. They take a multi-channel method to material, and often are even composing material to support post-conversion teams like client success.
When dealing with your content group on this, make sure you emphasize that this is a new material type that can be added to editorial planning. Not something that'll change or require to change the types of material they're already composing.
Regard their expertise.
Composing is hard. Doing it well requires tremendous skill and practice, but unfortunately, I've heard many SEOs talk about writers as if they didn't know anything, even if they do not understand SEO.
As an SEO, you'll get far with your content department simply by appreciating their know-how. Just as numerous SEO Managers aren't writers, it's unjust of us to anticipate authors to have the SEO understanding of a full-time SEO expert.
Prior to you implement a content brief process, take a seat with the Content Lead and members of the content group to assess their search maturity. What do they really need your assist with? Trust them with the rest.
Show outcomes.
One of the very best ways to get and preserve buy-in is by revealing outcomes. Program your content team how much of their traffic is originating from natural search and how, unlike lots of other content discovery channels, that traffic is staying consistent with time. Provide the writer a shout-out when you notice their post ranking on page one.
Hint:
You can remove this information by activating Premium Plan